veilid/veilid-python/tests/test_routing_context.py

111 lines
3.8 KiB
Python
Raw Normal View History

2023-06-16 00:22:54 +00:00
# Routing context veilid tests
import asyncio
2023-06-17 18:34:09 +00:00
import pytest
import veilid
2023-06-17 19:09:40 +00:00
from veilid.types import OperationId
2023-06-17 18:34:09 +00:00
2023-06-17 18:37:39 +00:00
from .conftest import server_info
2023-06-16 00:22:54 +00:00
##################################################################
2023-06-17 18:34:09 +00:00
2023-06-16 00:22:54 +00:00
@pytest.mark.asyncio
2023-06-17 18:34:09 +00:00
async def test_routing_contexts(api_connection):
rc = await api_connection.new_routing_context()
rcp = await rc.with_privacy()
rcps = await rcp.with_sequencing(veilid.Sequencing.ENSURE_ORDERED)
await rcps.with_custom_privacy(veilid.Stability.RELIABLE)
2023-06-16 00:22:54 +00:00
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_routing_context_app_message_loopback():
2023-06-17 19:09:40 +00:00
# Seriously, mypy?
app_message_queue: asyncio.Queue = asyncio.Queue()
2023-06-16 00:22:54 +00:00
async def app_message_queue_update_callback(update: veilid.VeilidUpdate):
if update.kind == veilid.VeilidUpdateKind.APP_MESSAGE:
await app_message_queue.put(update)
2023-06-17 18:34:09 +00:00
hostname, port = server_info()
api = await veilid.json_api_connect(
hostname, port, app_message_queue_update_callback
)
2023-06-16 00:22:54 +00:00
async with api:
2023-06-16 17:14:34 +00:00
# purge routes to ensure we start fresh
await api.debug("purge routes")
2023-06-17 18:34:09 +00:00
2023-06-16 00:22:54 +00:00
# make a routing context that uses a safety route
rc = await (await api.new_routing_context()).with_privacy()
2023-06-16 15:57:55 +00:00
# make a new local private route
prl, blob = await api.new_private_route()
2023-06-16 00:22:54 +00:00
2023-06-16 15:57:55 +00:00
# import it as a remote route as well so we can send to it
prr = await api.import_remote_private_route(blob)
2023-06-17 18:34:09 +00:00
2023-06-16 15:57:55 +00:00
# send an app message to our own private route
2023-06-16 00:22:54 +00:00
message = b"abcd1234"
2023-06-16 15:57:55 +00:00
await rc.app_message(prr, message)
2023-06-16 00:22:54 +00:00
# we should get the same message back
2023-06-17 18:34:09 +00:00
update: veilid.VeilidUpdate = await asyncio.wait_for(
app_message_queue.get(), timeout=10
)
2023-06-17 19:09:40 +00:00
assert isinstance(update.detail, veilid.VeilidAppMessage)
assert update.detail.message == message
2023-06-16 00:22:54 +00:00
2023-06-16 15:57:55 +00:00
@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_routing_context_app_call_loopback():
2023-06-17 19:09:40 +00:00
app_call_queue: asyncio.Queue = asyncio.Queue()
2023-06-16 15:57:55 +00:00
async def app_call_queue_update_callback(update: veilid.VeilidUpdate):
if update.kind == veilid.VeilidUpdateKind.APP_CALL:
await app_call_queue.put(update)
2023-06-17 18:34:09 +00:00
hostname, port = server_info()
api = await veilid.json_api_connect(hostname, port, app_call_queue_update_callback)
2023-06-16 15:57:55 +00:00
async with api:
2023-06-16 17:14:34 +00:00
# purge routes to ensure we start fresh
await api.debug("purge routes")
2023-06-16 15:57:55 +00:00
# make a routing context that uses a safety route
rc = await (await api.new_routing_context()).with_privacy()
# make a new local private route
prl, blob = await api.new_private_route()
# import it as a remote route as well so we can send to it
prr = await api.import_remote_private_route(blob)
2023-06-17 18:34:09 +00:00
2023-06-16 15:57:55 +00:00
# send an app message to our own private route
request = b"abcd1234"
2023-06-17 18:34:09 +00:00
app_call_task = asyncio.create_task(
rc.app_call(prr, request), name="app call task"
)
2023-06-16 15:57:55 +00:00
# we should get the same request back
2023-06-17 18:34:09 +00:00
update: veilid.VeilidUpdate = await asyncio.wait_for(
app_call_queue.get(), timeout=10
)
2023-06-17 19:09:40 +00:00
appcall = update.detail
assert isinstance(appcall, veilid.VeilidAppCall)
2023-06-16 15:57:55 +00:00
assert appcall.message == request
# now we reply to the request
reply = b"qwer5678"
2023-06-17 19:09:40 +00:00
# TK: OperationId use to be a subclass of `int`. When I wrapped `appcall.call_id` in int(),
# this failed JSON schema validation, which defines `call_id` as a string. Maybe that was a
# typo, and OperationId is really *supposed* to be a str? Alternatively, perhaps the
# signature of `app_call_reply` is wrong and it's supposed to take a type other than
# OperationId?
await api.app_call_reply(OperationId(appcall.call_id), reply)
2023-06-16 15:57:55 +00:00
# now we should get the reply from the call
result = await app_call_task
assert result == reply