Properly handle 5xx errors from webhook calls
This commit is contained in:
parent
45c5e5ed42
commit
ee3ac44664
@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
|
||||
using System;
|
||||
using System.Collections.Generic;
|
||||
using System.IO;
|
||||
using System.Linq;
|
||||
@ -17,6 +18,9 @@ using Serilog;
|
||||
|
||||
namespace PluralKit.Bot
|
||||
{
|
||||
public class WebhookExecutionErrorOnDiscordsEnd: Exception {
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public class WebhookExecutorService
|
||||
{
|
||||
private WebhookCacheService _webhookCache;
|
||||
@ -73,7 +77,7 @@ namespace PluralKit.Bot
|
||||
var responseString = await response.Content.ReadAsStringAsync();
|
||||
if (responseString.StartsWith("<"))
|
||||
// if the response starts with a < it's probably a CloudFlare error or similar, so just force-break
|
||||
response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();
|
||||
throw new WebhookExecutionErrorOnDiscordsEnd();
|
||||
|
||||
var responseJson = JsonConvert.DeserializeObject<JObject>(responseString);
|
||||
if (responseJson.ContainsKey("code"))
|
||||
@ -91,6 +95,11 @@ namespace PluralKit.Bot
|
||||
throw Errors.AttachmentTooLarge; // should be caught by the check above but just makin' sure
|
||||
|
||||
// TODO: look into what this actually throws, and if this is the correct handling
|
||||
if ((int) response.StatusCode >= 500)
|
||||
// If it's a 5xx error code, this is on Discord's end, so we throw an execution exception
|
||||
throw new WebhookExecutionErrorOnDiscordsEnd();
|
||||
|
||||
// Otherwise, this is going to throw on 4xx, and bubble up to our Sentry handler
|
||||
response.EnsureSuccessStatusCode();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -20,6 +20,9 @@ namespace PluralKit.Bot
|
||||
// Discord server errors are *not our problem*
|
||||
if (e is HttpException he && ((int) he.HttpCode) >= 500) return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Webhook server errors are also *not our problem*
|
||||
if (e is WebhookExecutionErrorOnDiscordsEnd) return false;
|
||||
|
||||
// Socket errors are *not our problem*
|
||||
if (e is SocketException) return false;
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user